Skip to content

Use case — Bring your own store backend

The bundled SQL adapter lets you rename tables with WithNaming, but it owns the column layout. When you need custom column names too — an existing schema you cannot reshape, encrypted columns, a table shared with other systems, or a non-SQL backend entirely — you implement the store substore interfaces yourself and pass your aggregate to op.WithStore. The library observes none of the physical names; it only sees the store.* Go structs your code maps rows onto.

Choose this path only when the SQL adapter cannot represent your persistence boundary. It gives maximum control, but it also makes you responsible for bearer-secret hashing, sentinel errors, concurrency, and transactions. If default columns are acceptable, use the SQL adapter; if only user lookup is custom, replace only the user store.

Source: examples/26-byo-store-from-scratch — a complete store.Store over SQLite with a hand-rolled vault_* schema, driven through a real browser login round-trip in CI.

What you implement

store.Store is an aggregate of small substore interfaces (each owns one record kind and exposes one to five methods). For an authorization-code OP you implement these non-nil:

SubstoreInterfaceMethods
Clientsstore.ClientStoreGetClient (skip ClientRegistry unless you support dynamic registration)
Authorization codesstore.AuthorizationCodeStoreSave / Find / Consume
Refresh tokensstore.RefreshTokenStoreSave / Find / Consume / RevokeChain / RevokeByGrant
Grantsstore.GrantStoreSave / Find / FindBySubjectClient / ListBySubject / Delete / HasAny
Sessionsstore.SessionStoreSave / Find / Touch / Delete / ListByChooserGroup
PARstore.PushedAuthRequestStoreSave / Find / Consume
Interactionsstore.InteractionStoreCASSave / Find / Delete / CompareAndSwap / DeleteIfUnchanged
Consumed JTIsstore.ConsumedJTIStoreMark / Has
Usersstore.UserPasswordStoreFindBySubject / FindByUsername / ReadPasswordHash
Access tokensstore.AccessTokenRegistryRegister / Find / RevokeByJTI / RevokeByGrant / GC
Metadatastore.MetadataStoreGet / Set

The remaining substore accessors may return nil when you do not enable the matching feature — OpaqueAccessTokens, InitialAccessTokens, RegistrationAccessTokens, DeviceCodes, CIBARequests, and GrantRevocations. The library detects nil at op.New and rejects the option that would have needed it, rather than panicking later. To skip GrantRevocations you must also pin op.WithAccessTokenRevocationStrategy(op.RevocationStrategyNone) (non-FAPI deployments only); the default grant-tombstone strategy requires that substore at construction time.

Capabilities the constructor requires

Beyond the substores themselves, the OP detects a handful of extension interfaces by runtime type assertion. A capability lives on an extension rather than on a core substore whenever some constructible OP does not need it — a machine-to-machine backend that never mounts /authorize should not have to implement browser-flow machinery. What matters for a backend author is that an extension whose absence would break a configured flow is verified at op.New, not discovered on a live request. The error names both the interface and the condition that made it mandatory.

ExtensionAsserted onRequired when
store.Transactionalthe aggregate Storea grant mounts /authorize
store.InteractionStoreCASStore.Interactions()a grant mounts /authorize
store.GrantClientListerStore.Grants()a grant mounts /authorize
store.RefreshRetryResponseStoreStore.RefreshTokens()refresh_token is enabled and cookie keys are configured
store.ClientRegistrythe aggregate Storeop.WithDynamicRegistration

Only grant.AuthorizationCode currently mounts /authorize, so a store backing only client_credentials, device_code, or CIBA needs none of the first three.

  • Transactional hands out a store.Tx whose AuthorizationCodes(), Grants(), RefreshTokens(), PushedAuthRequests(), AccessTokens(), OpaqueAccessTokens(), and GrantRevocations() are bound to one underlying transaction. Authorization completion commits the grant, PAR consumption, and code persistence together, so a signing or persistence fault cannot consume a request_uri without emitting a code. Grant reads inside a transaction must lock rows, run serializable, or surface an equivalent conflict before Save — grouping an unlocked SELECT with an unconditional Save still loses concurrent consent updates. Sessions, Interactions, and ConsumedJTIs are deliberately absent from Tx.
  • InteractionStoreCAS makes a terminal interaction immutable before those durable writes start. CompareAndSwap replaces a record only while its RawState is unchanged (ErrConflict otherwise, ErrNotFound when absent or expired), and DeleteIfUnchanged removes it only if nothing raced.
  • GrantClientLister is the bounded audience view Back-Channel Logout fans out from: ListClientIDsBySubject(ctx, subject, cursor, limit) returns at most limit distinct client IDs in a stable ascending order, plus a NextCursor when another page exists. Bound the query itself to limit+1 rows — implementing it by calling ListBySubject and slicing the result defeats the point, which is capping database and client-registry work per logout notice.
  • RefreshRetryResponseStore persists an already-sealed token response against its consumed predecessor so the RFC 9700 delivery grace window can re-emit the exact same successor instead of branching the chain. SaveRotationWithRetry must write the successor and the sealed blob in one operation; a backend that cannot make that atomic must not expose the interface at all. Treat the blob as opaque, key it by a one-way digest of the predecessor, and retain it no longer than the predecessor's own lifetime.

These stay optional, and the OP degrades rather than refusing to start:

ExtensionAsserted onWhat you lose
store.StaticClientReconcilerthe aggregate StoreWithStaticClients records are not reconciled against the backend
store.RevokeByClientStore.RefreshTokens() and the access-token substoresdeleting a dynamically registered client skips that substore's bulk credential cascade
store.RefreshChainResolverStore.RefreshTokens()chain walks resolve through Find instead of the stored-handle lookup

Verify the placement, don't infer it

op/store/contract runs the core contract against your backend and skips each extension you do not implement, so the suite tells you which capabilities you actually landed.

Column names are yours

The example proves the point by giving every table and column a deliberately non-OIDC name. Nothing in the library cares:

Store recordExample tableExample columns
Clientvault_relying_partiesrelying_party, redirect / scope metadata
Uservault_principalsprincipal (the subject), login_name, secret_phc
Authorization codevault_grant_codescode_digest, principal, relying_party, requested_scope, issued_epoch, expires_epoch, consumed_epoch
Refresh tokenvault_renewal_slipstoken_secret_digest, ledger_id, is_void
Grantvault_consent_ledgerledger_id, granted_scope
PARvault_pushed_handleshandle_digest
Sessionvault_browser_seatsseat_id, chooser_band
Access tokenvault_wire_tokensjti, ledger_id, is_revoked

principal is the subject, relying_party is the client id, ledger_id is the grant id — the substore implementations are the sole place the physical schema is mapped onto the store.* structs.

Contracts you must honour

The substore godoc is normative. A backend that compiles but ignores these does not satisfy the interface:

  1. Hash-on-store. AuthorizationCode.ID, RefreshToken.ID, and PushedAuthRequest.URI are opaque bearer secrets: possession alone redeems them. Hash the presented value (SHA-256, ideally HMAC'd with a server-side pepper) before persisting, store only the digest, and on Find / Consume hash the presented value to look the digest up, comparing in constant time. The example uses SHA-256 without a pepper to stay self-contained, matching the in-memory reference; production backends SHOULD add the pepper.
  2. Sentinel errors. Return store.ErrNotFound, store.ErrAlreadyExists, store.ErrAlreadyConsumed, store.ErrConflict, and store.ErrTxRequired exactly where the method godoc says (map sql.ErrNoRowsErrNotFound; a second ConsumeErrAlreadyConsumed). Callers switch on these with errors.Is; returning a different error for a listed failure mode breaks the contract even though it compiles.
  3. Atomicity. Exchanging a code, rotating a refresh token, and consuming a PAR each cross several record kinds. The library relies on each substore's Save / Consume being individually atomic, and a backend serving the browser authorization-code flow MUST implement store.Transactional so multi-substore writes share one underlying transaction (see Capabilities the constructor requires). The example implements it the same way the bundled adapter does: substores take a small querier interface that both *sql.DB and *sql.Tx satisfy, and BeginTx hands out cluster substores bound to one *sql.Tx.
  4. PAR expiry belongs to Find, not Consume. PushedAuthRequestStore.Find is the presentation-time expiry gate when the browser brings request_uri to /authorize. Consume enforces single-use only and must not reject solely because ExpiresAt passed after presentation; otherwise a long login / MFA / consent interaction could fail at code emission after the OP had already accepted the request.

Which approach fits

You wantUse
Default tables, just persistenceSQL adapter
Your own table names, default columnsSQL adapter + WithNaming
Keep your existing users table, default OIDC recordsBring your own user store
Your own table and column names everywhere, or a non-SQL backendThis page

Run it

sh
(cd examples/26-byo-store-from-scratch && go run -tags example .)

The example starts the OP on :8080 and a paired RP on :9090. Sign in as demo@example.test / demo; the RP's /me page shows the released ID Token claims, served entirely from the vault_* schema.